BREAD UNIVERSITY

?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄 첨부

5bd34beafba4b7afa4e81fefb35799b2.jpg



Intellectual tyrant


The growing and deepening polarization of our society is making people an intellectual tyrant. The atmosphere of judging and condemning the other person with a confrontational view of politics has passed over the normality. It is said that ignorant is brave. Left-to-right, socialism-to-liberal democracy, ruling party-to-opposition, modernism-to-conservatism, liberal theology-to-orthodoxy, obsession, prejudice, and ignorance that emerge from contextual and normative understanding are mass-producing intellectual tyrants.


Looking at the media and social communication network, we can confirm that we are living in an era of intellectual tyrants. A desperate intellectual makes claims like a psychopath. In some cases, the claim is not consistent with the proofs, or the claim is completely unfounded.

 

Heretics who make absurd claims in the conners of the church are overthrown, justifying evangelism by lying and take it for granted in the name of 'moving the mountain', which is no different from robbing the property of an existing church. Recently, an absurd YouTube video called "The Counselor" in the prison is the judge of God, has uploaded as a Facebook sponsored video.

 

Media companies prefer 'Fact Check'. It seems that they believe that facts are always verifiable and true. As matter of fact, the fact is not as pure and objective as you might think. This is due to the various relative factors involved in the process of fact production and the interpreter's limitations. Interpreters tend to find what they want in the fact rather than the fact itself. True and false, right and wrong, and the fact check that confirms this are all areas where interpretive or hermaneutical insight is needed.

 

There is a distinction between philosophical hermeneutics and the hermeneutics of Christian Bible. The two are closely related. Both Bible interpreters and commentators work on hermeneutical grounds. Whether they are conscious or not, they use a series of premises, principles, and interpretations. Interpretation and premise-perspective-preunderstanding have a close relationship.

 

There are limits to a person's ability. Even the best interpreters have limitations. If you do not understand the limits of your intellectual abilities, you will fall into an intellectual tyrant. Immanuel Kant's epistemology has contributed greatly to humanity in that it points out the limits of human reason.

 

To overcome the limitations of intellectual abilities, it is essential to discuss the understanding of the group, traditions, and the spirit of the age of the producer of the fact or text, and the relation of interpreter or reader. Hermeneutics critically identifies the relationship between text and the author who produced it and the reader who reads and interprets it.


This progress of examination appropriates the method of interpretation for linguistic, pictorial, and other forms of human expression in text. It provides a comprehensive view of the influences on the development of the hermeneutic thinking of the individual who interprets the text, the situation in which the interpretation takes place and the important characteristics of the interpreter.

 

Modern humanities are focused on hermeneutic questions. No academic activity is possible without raising hermeneutical questions. Consistent with this trend, modern theology focuses on hermeneutical discussions that narrow the distance between two horizons, the text of the past and the interpreter of the present.

 

The church history or history of Christianity served by Christian is a history of constant interpretation. Conveying the gospel and confessing and applying it to living faith in today's field of life requires interpretation and reinterpretation of the Christian text, the Bible, and things related to it.

 

This work has always been accompanied by new tensions. The Christian community has shown different views on a variety of issues. Even today, he.she takes a different position on the baptism, gift of the Holy Spirit, the laying hands on women, the nature and authority of the doctrine, the content and form of church education, the structure and institution of the church, the traditions of the church, and sex identity or homosexual issues. This is because the interpretation of the text and things related to it is different.

 

This difference is more pronounced by those who want to critically review the Church's existing position and those who defend it at any cost. The theologian's mission is to identify possible issues of concern and to provide appropriate criteria for critical and constructive review of religious common heritage. This effort requires interpretation and reinterpretation of the external and internal elements of faith, such as the Bible, church tradition, confession of faith, doctrine, theology, and history.

 

Idolism, which is often found among theologians seeking to defend biblical faith, tends to absolutize their beliefs as the only “biblical” view. By thinking about what he has been dealing with so far in the same way and putting it in the same form, he thinks that he is transcending all positions. He puts himself in the center of nature and the universe, sets himself as the basis for all thoughts and judgments, and considers his subjective view 'objective'. Even theologians say their opinions, but often say, "To be objective...."

 

The irony is that even theologians under the theological modernism with with a relativistic paradigm of truth take a very exclusive attitude towards their views and other beliefs, especially orthodox. It is a common practice that it is often the time to “new shaman kills man and womern”. This phenomenon occurs because of the lack of mutual understanding and neglecting the analytical conditions and processes involved in understanding the text

 

Human understanding of the truth will always be influenced and influenced by the historical and cultural context of the era in which they live. There is no imaginary, metaphysical, super-historical or super-human realm in which human beings can learn infallible truths except the divine realm of special revelation. Therefore, it is impossible for man and women to know truth that is reasonably absolute or propositionally profound. For this reason, sound intellectuals always try to learn and humbly explore the certainty of truth by realizing the hermeneutic conditions and limitations of understanding the truth.

 

Intellectuals who are not intellectual tyrants should be critical of any distortions, prejudices, and mistakes that they may have, and are not willing to interpret the text in hermeneutical activities in a way that fits their own understanding, and at the same time, willingly respect the views of others. His pre-understanding is reviewed by the text, and he has a proactive attitude to be willing to correct his or her hermeneutical insights based on the results of hermeneutical review.

 

A person who is not an intellectual tyrant, as St. Augustine said, does not read the text, but constantly tries to make the text read himself/herself and be aware of his/her needs and the work of the Holy Spirit in himself. Instead of interpreting the Bible, the Biblical text inperprets the readers, subordinate themselves to the Word and the Holy Spirit while maintaining a self-critical attitude.

 

The ideal interpreter is interested in the interpretation of the text, the world in which the interpreter is living and themselves. Insights into hermeneutic limitations or conditions, that act of reading the text promote readers comprehension. Hermeneutics is not an optional task to contend with speculative theologians, but an essential task for all theologians seeking the certainty of truth. No religious tradition, no theological tradition, or no church tradition exempt the obligations of hermeneutical and critical thinking.

 

The Reverend Douglass Choi, Ph.D.

Professor of Christian Dogmatics

President, Peniel Theological Seminary, Korea

President, BREAD UNIVERSITY, a platform of supplying theological lectures,


Copyright, all reserved by REFORMANDA

choicollege@naver.com


▶ 아래의 SNS 아이콘을 누르시면 많은 사람들이 읽을 수 있습니다.




  1. 교파들 사이에 신앙고백적 차이가 없는가?

    교파들 사이에 신앙고백적 차이가 없는가? 원제: 화이부동(和而不同)은 가능한가?       한국교회의 신학적 정체성이 모호해지고 있는 증상은 여러 면에서 나타난다. 강단에서 외치는 설교에 응집력과 일관성 있는 교리가 없다. 확실성을 가진 진리체계를 제...
    Date2020.06.13 Reply0 Views24 file
    Read More
  2. Intellectual tyrant

    Intellectual tyrant The growing and deepening polarization of our society is making people an intellectual tyrant. The atmosphere of judging and condemning the other person with a confrontational view of politics has passed over the normali...
    Date2020.05.13 Reply0 Views24 file
    Read More
  3. 지적 폭군

    Burchard of WormsㅡBishop of the Imperial City of Worms (재위 1000-1025) 지적 폭군 최덕성 해석학 강의록 1: 머리말      "자기가 본문을 해석하는 게 아니라 본문이 자기를 해석하게 하라"(어거스틴)   우리 사회의 증대되고 심화되는 양극화는 사람들...
    Date2020.05.12 Reply0 Views70 file
    Read More
  4. 쌍두마차시대

    쌍두마차시대 최덕성 교수의 『쌍두마차시대』(2012)를 읽고/ 정태홍 박사 교황과 황제 그리고 중세 망딸리떼 무릇 책이라는 것은 제목을 보면 ‘그 책이 무엇을 말하는가?’하는 답이 나와야 한다. 요즘에 나오는 책들을 보면 너무 감성적인 제목이 많다. 제목...
    Date2020.03.25 Reply0 Views296 file
    Read More
  5. 종교개혁전야

    종교개혁전야 최덕성 교수의 <종교개혁전야>(2003)을 읽으면서/ 최재호 최덕성 박사와 만남   1. 내가 본 최덕성 박사   최덕성 박사를 처음 만난 것은 2000년대 초반 고려신학대학원에서였다. 높은 콧날과 금테 안경 너머로 보이는 강렬한 눈빛은 그가 매우 ...
    Date2020.03.25 Reply0 Views177 file
    Read More
  6. THE ROOTS OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CONFLICTS

    THE ROOTS OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CONFLICTS IN KOREA, 1910-1950 Doctor of Philosophy, Dissertation DOUG CHOI EMORY UNIVERSITY, 1992     PREFACE      In the 1920s, Dr. George L. Paik published his Yale dissertation, The History of the Protestant...
    Date2020.03.25 Reply0 Views147 file
    Read More
  7. THE CONLICTS IN THE VIEWS OF THE BIBLE, PCK

    THE CONLICTS IN THE VIEWS OF THE BIBLE, PCK Master of Sacred Theology, Thesis DOUG CHOI YALE UNIVERISTY, 1985 Introduction   The Bible is the foundation of theology, the primary source for Christian knowledge, and a basis of the Church chur...
    Date2020.03.25 Reply0 Views624 file
    Read More
  8. KOREAN CHRISTIANITY

    KOREAN CHRISTIANITY   Book Review   KOREAN CHRISTIANITY: THE PREDOMINANCE OF REFORMED ORTHODOXY by Douglass Choi, Ph.D.   I have long felt that there was a need for such a book Korean Christianity: The Predominance of Reformed Orthodoxy(Ana...
    Date2020.03.25 Reply0 Views140 file
    Read More
  9. 단순한 삶이 아름답다

    단순한 삶이 아름답다 (가본) 예문:  단순한 것이 아름답고 편리하다        1. 최첨단 기계   나는 대학교에서 가르치는 일을 하기 전에 여러 해 목회자로 봉사했다. 목회를 하는 동안 교회당을 건축한 적이 있다. 약 2만 평의 부지에 총 면적 약 500평의 ㄱ...
    Date2020.03.25 Reply0 Views153 file
    Read More
  10. 자아통제력이 강해야 성공한다

    자아통제력이 강해야 성공한다 (가본) 예문: 어린이는 완전한 사람이다 1. 덜 자란 어른 텔레비전 프로그램 “경찰청 사람들”은 “덜 자란 어른”이라는 제목으로 실제 사건 하나를 극화하여 방영했다. 고등학교를 졸업하고 독일에서 6년간 대학과 대학원을 다닌...
    Date2020.03.25 Reply0 Views149 file
    Read More
  11. 자존감이 높여야 두뇌가 좋아진다

    자존감이 높여야 두뇌가 좋아진다(가본) 예문: 어린이-우리의 희망, 가능성 덩어리    하나   어린이는 작은 우주이다. 상상력의 천재이며, 가능성 덩어리이다. 그 가슴에는 원자탄의 정력과 고양이의 호기심과 시인의 감정을 가지고 있다. 예술가의 혼, 독재...
    Date2020.03.25 Reply0 Views142 file
    Read More
  12. 아버지의 그림자도 밟지 말라

    아버지의 그림자도 밟지 말라 (가본) 머리말: 대박이 쏟아지는 자녀교육        아주 탁월한 자녀교육 방법, 대박이 쏟아지게 하는 자녀교육 책은 없을까? 자기 자식을 잘 키우고 싶어 하지 않는 부모는 없다. 자식을 잘 키우고싶다고 하여 저절로 되는 것이 ...
    Date2020.03.25 Reply0 Views168 file
    Read More
  13. WCC 바로 알라

    WCC 바로 알라 최덕성 교수의 <WCC 바로 알라: 네 이웃에 대하여 거짓증거 하지 말라>(2013)을 읽고/ 변정희 기자 1. 유익한 신학논쟁   어거스틴은 당대의 교회의 필요를 채우는 글을 쓰는 과정에서 기독교사상사의 주류를 형성하는 여러 가지 신학적인 답을...
    Date2020.03.25 Reply0 Views352 file
    Read More
  14. WCC 무엇이 문제인가?

    WCC 무엇이 문제인가? 최덕성 저 (서울: 총회출판국, 2010) 세계교회협의회(WCC) 제10차 총회(부산, 벡스코)를 앞두고, 최덕성은 아래의 표지 그림의 <WCC 아이덴티티>(서울: 본문과현장사이, 2010)를 출간했다.  WCC 신학의 핵심 사상을 10가지로 정리한다. ...
    Date2020.03.25 Reply0 Views377 file
    Read More
  15. 신학충돌 II: 세계교회협의회와 한국교회

    신학충돌 II:  한국교회와 세계교회협의회 최덕성 교수의 『신학충돌 II:  한국교회와 세계교회협의회』(2013)를 읽고/ 권세일 박사 한국기독교의 이종서식(異種棲息)   최덕성 교수의 『신학충돌 II: 한국교회와 세계교회협의회』(2013)는 세계교회협의회(Wo...
    Date2020.03.25 Reply0 Views237 file
    Read More
목록
Board Pagination Prev 1 2 3 Next
/ 3