신학라이브러리

?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄 첨부

5bd34beafba4b7afa4e81fefb35799b2.jpg



Intellectual tyrant


The growing and deepening polarization of our society is making people an intellectual tyrant. The atmosphere of judging and condemning the other person with a confrontational view of politics has passed over the normality. It is said that ignorant is brave. Left-to-right, socialism-to-liberal democracy, ruling party-to-opposition, modernism-to-conservatism, liberal theology-to-orthodoxy, obsession, prejudice, and ignorance that emerge from contextual and normative understanding are mass-producing intellectual tyrants.


Looking at the media and social communication network, we can confirm that we are living in an era of intellectual tyrants. A desperate intellectual makes claims like a psychopath. In some cases, the claim is not consistent with the proofs, or the claim is completely unfounded.

 

Heretics who make absurd claims in the conners of the church are overthrown, justifying evangelism by lying and take it for granted in the name of 'moving the mountain', which is no different from robbing the property of an existing church. Recently, an absurd YouTube video called "The Counselor" in the prison is the judge of God, has uploaded as a Facebook sponsored video.

 

Media companies prefer 'Fact Check'. It seems that they believe that facts are always verifiable and true. As matter of fact, the fact is not as pure and objective as you might think. This is due to the various relative factors involved in the process of fact production and the interpreter's limitations. Interpreters tend to find what they want in the fact rather than the fact itself. True and false, right and wrong, and the fact check that confirms this are all areas where interpretive or hermaneutical insight is needed.

 

There is a distinction between philosophical hermeneutics and the hermeneutics of Christian Bible. The two are closely related. Both Bible interpreters and commentators work on hermeneutical grounds. Whether they are conscious or not, they use a series of premises, principles, and interpretations. Interpretation and premise-perspective-preunderstanding have a close relationship.

 

There are limits to a person's ability. Even the best interpreters have limitations. If you do not understand the limits of your intellectual abilities, you will fall into an intellectual tyrant. Immanuel Kant's epistemology has contributed greatly to humanity in that it points out the limits of human reason.

 

To overcome the limitations of intellectual abilities, it is essential to discuss the understanding of the group, traditions, and the spirit of the age of the producer of the fact or text, and the relation of interpreter or reader. Hermeneutics critically identifies the relationship between text and the author who produced it and the reader who reads and interprets it.


This progress of examination appropriates the method of interpretation for linguistic, pictorial, and other forms of human expression in text. It provides a comprehensive view of the influences on the development of the hermeneutic thinking of the individual who interprets the text, the situation in which the interpretation takes place and the important characteristics of the interpreter.

 

Modern humanities are focused on hermeneutic questions. No academic activity is possible without raising hermeneutical questions. Consistent with this trend, modern theology focuses on hermeneutical discussions that narrow the distance between two horizons, the text of the past and the interpreter of the present.

 

The church history or history of Christianity served by Christian is a history of constant interpretation. Conveying the gospel and confessing and applying it to living faith in today's field of life requires interpretation and reinterpretation of the Christian text, the Bible, and things related to it.

 

This work has always been accompanied by new tensions. The Christian community has shown different views on a variety of issues. Even today, he.she takes a different position on the baptism, gift of the Holy Spirit, the laying hands on women, the nature and authority of the doctrine, the content and form of church education, the structure and institution of the church, the traditions of the church, and sex identity or homosexual issues. This is because the interpretation of the text and things related to it is different.

 

This difference is more pronounced by those who want to critically review the Church's existing position and those who defend it at any cost. The theologian's mission is to identify possible issues of concern and to provide appropriate criteria for critical and constructive review of religious common heritage. This effort requires interpretation and reinterpretation of the external and internal elements of faith, such as the Bible, church tradition, confession of faith, doctrine, theology, and history.

 

Idolism, which is often found among theologians seeking to defend biblical faith, tends to absolutize their beliefs as the only “biblical” view. By thinking about what he has been dealing with so far in the same way and putting it in the same form, he thinks that he is transcending all positions. He puts himself in the center of nature and the universe, sets himself as the basis for all thoughts and judgments, and considers his subjective view 'objective'. Even theologians say their opinions, but often say, "To be objective...."

 

The irony is that even theologians under the theological modernism with with a relativistic paradigm of truth take a very exclusive attitude towards their views and other beliefs, especially orthodox. It is a common practice that it is often the time to “new shaman kills man and womern”. This phenomenon occurs because of the lack of mutual understanding and neglecting the analytical conditions and processes involved in understanding the text

 

Human understanding of the truth will always be influenced and influenced by the historical and cultural context of the era in which they live. There is no imaginary, metaphysical, super-historical or super-human realm in which human beings can learn infallible truths except the divine realm of special revelation. Therefore, it is impossible for man and women to know truth that is reasonably absolute or propositionally profound. For this reason, sound intellectuals always try to learn and humbly explore the certainty of truth by realizing the hermeneutic conditions and limitations of understanding the truth.

 

Intellectuals who are not intellectual tyrants should be critical of any distortions, prejudices, and mistakes that they may have, and are not willing to interpret the text in hermeneutical activities in a way that fits their own understanding, and at the same time, willingly respect the views of others. His pre-understanding is reviewed by the text, and he has a proactive attitude to be willing to correct his or her hermeneutical insights based on the results of hermeneutical review.

 

A person who is not an intellectual tyrant, as St. Augustine said, does not read the text, but constantly tries to make the text read himself/herself and be aware of his/her needs and the work of the Holy Spirit in himself. Instead of interpreting the Bible, the Biblical text inperprets the readers, subordinate themselves to the Word and the Holy Spirit while maintaining a self-critical attitude.

 

The ideal interpreter is interested in the interpretation of the text, the world in which the interpreter is living and themselves. Insights into hermeneutic limitations or conditions, that act of reading the text promote readers comprehension. Hermeneutics is not an optional task to contend with speculative theologians, but an essential task for all theologians seeking the certainty of truth. No religious tradition, no theological tradition, or no church tradition exempt the obligations of hermeneutical and critical thinking.

 

The Reverend Douglass Choi, Ph.D.

Professor of Christian Dogmatics

President, Peniel Theological Seminary, Korea

President, BREAD UNIVERSITY, a platform of supplying theological lectures,


Copyright, all reserved by REFORMANDA

choicollege@naver.com


▶ 아래의 SNS 아이콘을 누르시면 많은 사람들이 읽을 수 있습니다.




  1. 예장 고신, '그리스도의 능동 순종' 천명

    예장 고신 제72회 총회(2022), 포도원교회   예장 고신, '그리스도의 능동 순종' 천명   예장 고신 제71회에 상정된 “예수 그리스도의 능동 순종에 대한 총회의 신학적 입장에 대한 요청의 건”에 대하여 총회 신학위원회와 고려신학대학원 교수회 그리고 고신...
    Date2022.09.21 Reply1 Views247 file
    Read More
  2. 하얀 거짓말

        하얀 거짓말   선의의 거짓말, 성경적으로 정당화될 수 있나?     “여호수아가 기생 라합과 그의 아버지의 가족과 그에게 속한 모든 것을 살렸으므로 그가 오늘까지 이스라엘 중에 거주하였으니 이는 여호수아가 여리고를 정탐하려고 보낸 사자들을 숨겼...
    Date2022.09.09 Reply0 Views133 file
    Read More
  3. 로마가톨릭교회의 종교다원주의 문서

      네팔의 여신 '쿠마리' 로마가톨릭교회의 종교다원주의 문서   로마가톨릭교회 제2차 바티칸 공의회는 구원에 관하여 다음과 같이  선언한다. 1, “사실 자기 탓 없이 그리스도의 복음과 교회를 알지 못하지만 성실한 마음으로 하느님을 찾으며 양심의 명령으...
    Date2022.08.24 Reply0 Views130 file
    Read More
  4. 한국교회, 경계를 넘어서라!

        한국교회여, 경계를 넘어서라!   필즈상을 수상한 허준이 박사, 미국 프린스턴대학 교수 겸 한국고등과학원 석학 교수가 2022년 7월 13일 서울 동대문구 한국과학기술원 부설 고등과학원에서 “경계와 관계”라는 주제로 특별강연을 했다. 수학자로서 한 특...
    Date2022.07.14 Reply0 Views169 file
    Read More
  5. 변선환의 종교다원주의

        변선환의 종교다원주의   원졔: 언어게임, 포스트모더니즘, 종교다원주의: 변선환의 종교 다원주의 신학이 지닌 의의와 한계에 대한 비판적 고찰     Ⅰ. 들어가는 말   1992년, 감리교신학대학 학장으로 재직 중이던 변선환 박사는 감리교 서울연회 재판...
    Date2022.02.23 Reply0 Views299 file
    Read More
  6. 세상의 변화와 복음주의 선교학

        세상의 변화와 복음주의 선교학     변화하고 있는 선교에 대한 복음주의 선교학의 대응과 변화     침신대 이현모 교수 발표     지난 7월 초 한국세계선교협의회(대표회장 강승삼, 이하 KWMA)와 한인세계선교사회(KWMF) 주최로 열린 제5차 세계선교전략...
    Date2022.01.27 Reply0 Views180 file
    Read More
  7. 성경 사본학의 현재와 미래

        성경 사본학의 현재와 미래   변종길 박사/ 고려신학대학원   사람들은 “학자”(學者)에 대해 많은 기대를 한다. 여러 가지로 때묻고 혼탁한 세상에서 그래도 학자는 깨끗한 양심을 가지고 정직하게 진리를 가르쳐 줄 것이라고 기대한다. 그래서 비록 권세...
    Date2021.03.20 Reply0 Views453 file
    Read More
  8. 신약 사본학 이야기

      신약 사본학 이야기   제1장: 사본학! 왜 필요한 것인가?     사본학(정확하게 말하자면, 본문비평학=textual criticism)은 왜 필요한 것인가? 메쯔거의 신약사본학 책을 읽다보면 지겨워 성질이 나기 시작하고 드디어 책을 덮으면서 드는 생각이 바로 이것...
    Date2021.03.20 Reply0 Views504 file
    Read More
  9. 교파들 사이에 신앙고백적 차이가 없는가?

    교파들 사이에 신앙고백적 차이가 없는가? 원제: 화이부동(和而不同)은 가능한가?       한국교회의 신학적 정체성이 모호해지고 있는 증상은 여러 면에서 나타난다. 강단에서 외치는 설교에 응집력과 일관성 있는 교리가 없다. 확실성을 가진 진리체계를 제...
    Date2020.06.13 Reply0 Views675 file
    Read More
  10. Intellectual tyrant

    Intellectual tyrant The growing and deepening polarization of our society is making people an intellectual tyrant. The atmosphere of judging and condemning the other person with a confrontational view of politics has passed over the normali...
    Date2020.05.13 Reply0 Views9715 file
    Read More
  11. 지적 폭군

    Burchard of WormsㅡBishop of the Imperial City of Worms (재위 1000-1025) 지적 폭군 최덕성 해석학 강의록 1: 머리말      "자기가 본문을 해석하는 게 아니라 본문이 자기를 해석하게 하라"(어거스틴)   우리 사회의 증대되고 심화되는 양극화는 사람들...
    Date2020.05.12 Reply0 Views532 file
    Read More
  12. 쌍두마차시대

    쌍두마차시대 최덕성 교수의 『쌍두마차시대』(2012)를 읽고/ 정태홍 박사 교황과 황제 그리고 중세 망딸리떼 무릇 책이라는 것은 제목을 보면 ‘그 책이 무엇을 말하는가?’하는 답이 나와야 한다. 요즘에 나오는 책들을 보면 너무 감성적인 제목이 많다. 제목...
    Date2020.03.25 Reply0 Views724 file
    Read More
  13. 종교개혁전야

    종교개혁전야 최덕성 교수의 <종교개혁전야>(2003)을 읽으면서/ 최재호 최덕성 박사와 만남   1. 내가 본 최덕성 박사   최덕성 박사를 처음 만난 것은 2000년대 초반 고려신학대학원에서였다. 높은 콧날과 금테 안경 너머로 보이는 강렬한 눈빛은 그가 매우 ...
    Date2020.03.25 Reply0 Views497 file
    Read More
  14. THE ROOTS OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CONFLICTS

    THE ROOTS OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CONFLICTS IN KOREA, 1910-1950 Doctor of Philosophy, Dissertation DOUG CHOI EMORY UNIVERSITY, 1992     PREFACE      In the 1920s, Dr. George L. Paik published his Yale dissertation, The History of the Protestant...
    Date2020.03.25 Reply0 Views2515 file
    Read More
  15. THE CONLICTS IN THE VIEWS OF THE BIBLE, PCK

    THE CONLICTS IN THE VIEWS OF THE BIBLE, PCK Master of Sacred Theology, Thesis DOUG CHOI YALE UNIVERISTY, 1985 Introduction   The Bible is the foundation of theology, the primary source for Christian knowledge, and a basis of the Church chur...
    Date2020.03.25 Reply0 Views10246 file
    Read More
목록
Board Pagination Prev 1 2 3 Next
/ 3