아카이브

Extra Form
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄 첨부

Auburn_Genny.jpg

 

 

Auburn Affirmation (1923)

 

An Affirmation designed to safeguard the unity and liberty of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, submitted for the consideration of its ministers and people.

 

We, the undersigned, Ministers of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, feel bound, in view of certain actions of the General Assembly of 1923 and of persistent attempts to divide the church and abridge its freedom, to express our convictions in matters pertaining thereto. At the outset we affirm and declare our acceptance of the Westminster Confession of Faith, as we did at our ordinations, "as containing the system of doctrine taught in the Holy Scriptures." We sincerely hold and earnestly preach the doctrines of evangelical Christianity, in agreement with the historic testimony of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, of which we are loyal ministers. For the maintenance of the faith of our church, the preservation of its unity, and the protection of the liberties of its ministers and people, we offer this Affirmation.

 

The church's guarantees of liberty

 

(1) Concerning the interpretation of the Confession of Faith

 

I. By its law and its history, the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America safeguards the liberty of thought and teaching of its ministers. At their ordinations they "receive and adopt the Confession of this Church, as containing the system of doctrine taught in the Holy Scriptures." This the church has always esteemed a sufficient doctrinal subscription for its ministers. Manifestly it does not require their assent to the very words of the Confession, or to all of its teachings, or to interpretations of the Confession by individuals or church courts. The Confession of Faith itself disclaims infallibility. The authors would not allow this to church councils, their own included: "All synods or councils since the apostles' times, whether general or particular, may err, and many have erred; therefore they are not to be made the rule of faith or practice, but to be used as a help in both" (Conf. XXXI, iii). The Confession also expressly asserts the liberty of Christian believers, and condemns the submission of the mind or conscience to any human authority: "God alone is lord [sic] of the conscience and hath left it free from the doctrines and commandments of men which are in anything contrary to his Word, or beside it, in matters of faith or worship. So that to believe such doctrines, or to obey such commandments out of conscience, is to betray true liberty of conscience; and the requiring of an implicit faith, and an absolute and blind obedience, is to destroy liberty of conscience, and reason also" (Conf. XX, ii).

 

The formal relation of American Presbyterianism to the Westminster Confession of Faith begins in the Adopting Act of 1729. This anticipated and provided for dissent by individuals from portions of the Confession. At the formation of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, in 1788, the Westminster Confession was adopted as the creed of the church; and at the same time the church publicly declared the significance of its organization in a document which contains these words: "There are truths and forms, with respect to which men of good characters and principles may differ. And in all these they think it the duty, both of private Christians and Societies, to exercise mutual forbearance towards each other" (Declaration of Principles, v).

 

Of the two parts into which our church was separated from 1837 to 1870, one held that only one interpretation of certain parts of the Confession of Faith was legitimate, while the other maintained its right to dissent from this interpretation. In the Reunion of 1870 they came together on equal terms, "each recognizing the other as a sound and orthodox body." The meaning of this, as understood then and ever since, is that office-bearers in the church who maintain their liberty in the interpretation of the Confession are exercising their rights guaranteed by the terms of the Reunion.

 

A more recent reunion also is significant, that of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church and the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, in 1906. This reunion was opposed by certain members of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, on the ground that the two churches were not at one in doctrine; yet it was consummated. Thus did our church once more exemplify its historic policy of accepting theological differences within its bounds and subordinating them to recognized loyalty to Jesus Christ and united work for the kingdom of God.

 

(2) Concerning the interpretation of the Scriptures

 

With respect to the interpretation of the Scriptures the position of our church has been that common to Protestants. "The Supreme Judge," says the Confession of Faith, "by whom all controversies of religion are to be determined, and all decrees of councils, opinions of ancient writers, doctrines of men, and private spirits, are to be examined, and in whose sentence we are to rest, can be no other but the Holy Spirit speaking in the Scripture" (Conf. I, x). Accordingly our church has held that the supreme guide in the interpretation of the Scriptures is not, as it is with Roman Catholics, ecclesiastical authority, but the Spirit of God, speaking to the Christian believer. Thus our church lays it upon its ministers and others to read and teach the Scriptures as the Spirit of God through His manifold ministries instructs them, and to receive all truth which from time to time He causes to break forth from the Scriptures.

 

There is no assertion in the Scriptures that their writers were kept "from error." The Confession of Faith does not make this assertion; and it is significant that this assertion is not to be found in the Apostles' Creed or the Nicene Creed or in any of the great Reformation confessions. The doctrine of inerrancy, intended to enhance the authority of the Scriptures, in fact impairs their supreme authority for faith and life, and weakens the testimony of the church to the power of God unto salvation through Jesus Christ. We hold that the General Assembly of 1923, in asserting that "the Holy Spirit did so inspire, guide and move the writers of Holy Scripture as to keep them from error," spoke without warrant of the Scriptures or of the Confession of Faith. We hold rather to the words of the Confession of Faith, that the Scriptures "are given by inspiration of God, to be the rule of faith and life" (Conf. I, ii).

 

Authority under the constitution for the declaration of doctrine

 

II. While it is constitutional for any General Assembly "to bear testimony against error in doctrine," (Form of Govt. XII, v), yet such testimony is without binding authority, since the constitution of our church provides that its doctrine shall be declared only by concurrent action of the General Assembly and the presbyteries. Thus the church guards the statement of its doctrine against hasty or ill-considered action by either General Assemblies or presbyteries. From this provision of our constitution, it is evident that neither in one General Assembly nor in many, without concurrent action of the presbyteries, is there authority to declare what the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America believes and teaches; and that the assumption that any General Assembly has authoritatively declared what the church believes and teaches is groundless. A declaration by a General Assembly that any doctrine is "an essential doctrine" attempts to amend the constitution of the church in an unconstitutional manner.

 

Action of the General Assembly regarding the preaching in the first Presbyterian Church of New York City

 

III. The General Assembly of 1923, in asserting that "doctrines contrary to the standards of the Presbyterian Church" have been preached in the pulpit of the First Presbyterian Church of New York City, virtually pronounced a judgment against this church. The General Assembly did this with knowledge that the matter on which it so expressed itself was already under formal consideration in the Presbytery of New York, as is shown by the language of its action. The General Assembly acted in the case without giving hearing to the parties concerned. Thus the General Assembly did not conform to the procedure in such cases contemplated by our Book of Discipline, and, what is more serious, it in effect condemned a Christian minister without using the method of conference, patience and love enjoined on us by Jesus Christ. We object to the action of General Assembly in this case, as being out of keeping with the law and the spirit of our church.

 

The doctrinal deliverance of the General Assembly

 

IV. The General Assembly of 1923 expressed the opinion concerning five doctrinal statements that each one "is an essential doctrine of the Word of God and our standards." On the constitutional grounds which we have before described, we are opposed to any attempt to elevate these five doctrinal statements, or any of them, to the position of tests for ordination or for good standing in our church.

 

Furthermore, this opinion of the General Assembly attempts to commit our church to certain theories concerning the inspiration of the Bible, and the Incarnation, the Atonement, the Resurrection, and the Continuing Life and Supernatural Power of our Lord Jesus Christ. We all hold most earnestly to these great facts and doctrines; we all believe from our hearts that the writers of the Bible were inspired of God; that Jesus Christ was God manifest in the flesh; that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Himself, and through Him we have our redemption; that having died for our sins He rose from the dead and is our everliving Saviour; that in His earthly ministry He wrought many mighty works, and by His vicarious death and unfailing presence He is able to save to the uttermost. Some of us regard the particular theories contained in the deliverance of the General Assembly of 1923 as satisfactory explanations of these facts and doctrines. But we are united in believing that these are not the only theories allowed by the Scriptures and our standards as explanations of these facts and doctrines of our religion, and that all who hold to these facts and doctrines, whatever theories they may employ to explain them, are worthy of all confidence and fellowship.

 

Extent of the liberty claimed

 

V. We do not desire liberty to go beyond the teachings of evangelical Christianity. But we maintain that it is our constitutional right and our Christian duty within these limits to exercise liberty of thought and teaching, that we may more effectively preach the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Saviour of the World.

 

The spirit and purpose of this affirmation

 

VI. Finally, we deplore the evidences of division in our beloved church, in the face of a world so desperately in need of a united testimony to the gospel of Christ. We earnestly desire fellowship with all who like us are disciples of Jesus Christ. We hope that those to whom this Affirmation comes will believe that it is not the declaration of a theological party, but rather a sincere appeal, based on the Scriptures and our standards, for the preservation of the unity and freedom of our church, for which most earnestly we plead and pray.

 

Issued December, 1923; reprinted from a copy received by William Garrison Hunter II, October 29, 1934, cited in Edwin H. Rian, The Presbyterian Conflict, pp. 205-208.

 

 

 

▶ 아래의 SNS 아이콘을 누르시면 많은 사람들이 읽을 수 있습니다.

?

  1. 실패는 실패 아니다

        실패는 실패 아니다   “실패는 성공의 어머니다”. 유대인의 탈무드에 나오는 말이다. 온갖 시련과 실패를 딛고 일어선 유대인들에게 큰 영향을 끼쳤다. 유대인들은 오래전부터 어떠한 역경이 올지라도 실패를 실패로 받아들이지 않았다. 실패를 밝은 미래...
    Date2022.08.05 Byreformanda Reply0 Views12 file
    Read More
  2. 서두르지 않는 마음의 여유

        서두르지 않는 마음의 여유     이규태의 <한국인의 의식구조>는 한국 사람들은 식사 시에 “빨리, 더 빨리 먹어야 미덕”으로 여겨왔다고 지적한다. 한국인은 천천히 먹는 아이들을 다그쳐 식사를 빨리 끝내게 했다. 그 짧은 식사 시간마저 단축하고자 세...
    Date2022.07.23 Byreformanda Reply0 Views39 file
    Read More
  3. 얘수님의 터치

          예수님의 터치         미국의 전설적 인기 여배우 마릴린 몬로의 어린 시절은 불우했다. 미혼모인 어머니의 버림을 받고 어린 아이들을 대리 양육하는 포스터 홈(Foster Home)을 전전하며 자랐다.     마릴린 몬로가 나중에 여배우로 성공하여 스타덤에...
    Date2022.07.14 Byreformanda Reply0 Views68 file
    Read More
  4. 6.25전쟁 참전국과 참전 인원

        6.25전쟁 참전국과 참전 인원     사진: 포화 속 예배 인도자(Army Chaplains in Korea, 1950)   6.25전쟁 참전 인원수 (괄호내 사망자 수)   대한민국 국군 외 ----- 미국 1,600,000 (36,492) 영국 56,000 (1,177) 캐나다 27,000 (516) 터키 14,936 (1,0...
    Date2022.06.25 Byreformanda Reply0 Views73 file
    Read More
  5. 죽은 사무엘은 귀신이 되었는가?

        죽은 사무엘은 귀신이 되었는가?   버림 받은 메시아 사울이 마녀를 통해 죽은 사무엘과 만나는 장면은 구약성서 중에서 해독이 어려운 전승 중의 하나이다. 1) 마녀가 죽은 선지자도 불러낼 수 있는가? 2) 사무엘이 죽어 간 곳은 어딘가? 3) 만약 사무엘...
    Date2022.04.19 Byreformanda Reply0 Views176 file
    Read More
  6. 장로교회 분열이 고신 때문인가?

    최덕성 박사 (사진 이대웅 기자 찍음)   장로교회 분열이 고신 때문인가? 자학적 사관 탈피해야   제2회 고신포럼 ‘전환기의 한국교회와 고신의 역할’ 신사참배 거부운동 선봉장, 주기철 아닌 한상동교권주의자들, 입지 흔들릴까 출옥성도 제거해우상숭배에 ...
    Date2022.04.06 Byreformanda Reply0 Views175 file
    Read More
  7. 바울종교의 기원/ 메이첸

        그레이스앰 메이첸       바울종교의 기원/ 그레이스앰 메이첸   제1장  서론   기독교의 기원     본서의 의도는 어떤 특별한 관점 하에서 기독교의 기원문 제를 취급하려는 것이다. 그 문제는 역사적으로 중요한 문제인 동시에 실제적으로도 중요한 문...
    Date2022.04.03 Byreformanda Reply0 Views160 file
    Read More
  8. 강원룡 목사와 WCC의 용공성 시비

          강원룡 목사   강원룡 목사와 WCC의 용공성 시비     밴쿠버총회 후유증 앓는 진보교회 보고회서 뒤늦게 강원룡 목사 비난벽보사건 등 드러나     중앙일보 입력 1983.09.29 00:00     한국 진보교회들이 제6차 세계교회협의회(WCC) 밴쿠버총회(7월 24...
    Date2022.03.24 Byreformanda Reply0 Views157 file
    Read More
  9. 바아르선언문 배경 설명

        바아르선언문 배경 설명   뱅쿠버 회의(1983) 이후 적극적으로 추진된 6년 간의 종교 간의 대회를 거쳐서 세계교회협의회(WCC) 산하의 대화 담당 소위원회는 스위스 취리히 근방에 있는 작은 마을 바아르(Baar)에서 1990년 2월 선언문을 발표하였다. WCC ...
    Date2022.03.14 Byreformanda Reply0 Views165 file
    Read More
  10. WCC 총회의 성공적 개최를 위한 공동선언문(2013)

        WCC 총회의 성공적 개최를 위한 공동선언문(2013)     한국교회는 지난 130년 동안 민족의 고난과 역경을 함께하며 괄목할만한 영적 성장과 대한민국의 성장과 성숙을 이끄는 중심에 있었으며, 환난과 전쟁 속에서도 민족을 지킬 수 있었던 것에 대하여 ...
    Date2022.03.11 Byreformanda Reply0 Views138 file
    Read More
  11. 로마가톨릭교회의 만인보편구원주의

      부산 신사(용두산신사, 1915)     로마가톨릭교회의 만인보편구원주의   원제: '예수 없이도 구원 받는다'는 로마가톨릭교회   로마가톨릭교회는 예수 없이도 구원을 받는다고 한다. 예수를 믿지 않는 유태인과 무슬림도 구원받고, 미지의 신을 찾는 사람들...
    Date2022.02.22 Byreformanda Reply0 Views111 file
    Read More
  12. 독립선언문(1919, 원문번역)

        독립선언문(1919, 원문번역)       오등은 자에 아조선의 독립국임과 조선인의 자주민임을 선언하노라. 차로써 세계만방에 고하야 인류평등의 대의를 극명하며 차로써 자손만대에 고하야 민족자존의 정권을 영유케 하노라.   반만년 역사의 권위를 장하야...
    Date2022.02.15 Byreformanda Reply0 Views101 file
    Read More
  13. Auburn Affirmation (1923)

        Auburn Affirmation (1923)   An Affirmation designed to safeguard the unity and liberty of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, submitted for the consideration of its ministers and people.   We, the undersigned, Minis...
    Date2022.02.10 Byreformanda Reply0 Views158 file
    Read More
  14. 로잔언약 (The Lausanne Covenant, 1974)

        존 스토트, 로잔언약 초안자 (1997)   로잔언약 (The Lausanne Covenant, 1974)       로잔언약은 1974년 7월 16일부터 25일까지 스위스 로잔에서 모였던 "세계 복음화 국제대회의"에서 150개 국가에서 온 3,700여명의 선교지도자들이 합의하고 서명한 것...
    Date2022.02.07 Byreformanda Reply0 Views162 file
    Read More
  15. 바아르선언문 (전문)

      웨슬리 아리아라자와 최덕성 (2013.11.4, 부산 벡스코). WCC 종교다원주의자 아라아라자는 근무하면서 자기가  이 단체의 종교다원주의 신학을 발전시켰고  '바아르선언문' 초안을 작성했다고 말했다. 자신의 저서 [성서와 타종교인들과의 대화]는 나중에 ...
    Date2022.01.12 Byreformanda Reply0 Views206 file
    Read More
목록
Board Pagination Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 39 Next
/ 39